فوز ليز تراس بزعامة حزب المحافظين ورئاسة الحكومة في بريطانيا

فوز ليز تراس بزعامة حزب المحافظين ورئاسة الحكومة في بريطانيا فوز ليز تراس بزعامة حزب المحافظين ورئاسة الحكومة في بريطانيا فوز ليز تراس بزعامة حزب المحافظين ورئاسة الحكومة في بريطانيا فوز ليز تراس بزعامة حزب المحافظين ورئاسة الحكومة في بريطانيا فوز ليز تراس بزعامة حزب المحافظين ورئاسة الحكومة في بريطانيا

The text is the title, lead image caption and first three paragraphs of a September 2022 BBC News Arabic post about Liz Truss winning the leadership of the UK Conservative Party.

Below average
BALAGHA Score
9.2
Published
5 September 2022
Genre
Copyright

Copyrighted

[+ Explain]

Except has been used under "fair use" rules for academic purposes

Annotator
Balagha Corpus
Text# 2
Taxonomy
Published
11 June 2025
Citation: Marathe Mandar. 'Arabic rhetorical device annotation of "Liz Truss wins leadership of the Conservative Party and becomes Prime Minister of Britain"'. The Balagha Corpus Journal 1, no. 2 (2025): e2. https://doi.org/10.64393/balagha-corpus.2

Export JSONExport JSON annotations
Download source textDownload original text
Download PDF

Annotations of rhetorical devices in the text

All the rhetorical devices in the text have been identified and annotated as shown below:

Show badges Hide badges

CF2CE8فوزCF2 ليز تراس بزعامة حزب المحافظين ورئاسة الحكومة في بريطانيا

CF2تعهدت تراس في خطابها بإلحاق الهزيمة بحزب العمال في انتخابات عام 2024

CC1فازت وزيرة الخارجية البريطانية ليز تراس بزعامة حزب المحافظين الحاكم، لتصبح رئيسة للحكومة، خلفا لبوريس جونسون الذي A13أُجبر على الاستقالة بسبب B2سلسلة من CH1الفضائح.

وخلال A13الأسابيع القليلة الماضية، كانت استطلاعات الرأي لأعضاء حزب المحافظين ترجح فوز تراس على منافسها A13وزير الخزانة السابق ريشي سوناك.

وفازت تراس بـ57 في المئة من أصوات أعضاء الحزب، متفوقة على سوناك بنسبة 14 في المئة.

Rhetorical devices in the text

The following rhetorical devices were found when a rhetorical device analysis was performed on the text.

WordDevice
#
Word Rhetorical Device Annotator's explanation of the rhetorical device
Number: 1Device: CF-2 Finesse of Initiationicon
Explanation

This is a good starting for the article as it primes the reader for the content.

Rhetorical Impact Score: 1

Number: 2Device: CE-8 Forewarningicon
Explanation

This is a forewarning of what the content of the article is.

Rhetorical Impact Score: 1

Number: 3Device: CF-2 Finesse of Initiationicon
Explanation

This also is a good way to start the piece.

Rhetorical Impact Score: 1

Number: 4Device: CC-1 Repetitionicon
Explanation

This is a repetition of the title, which helps cement the understanding.

Rhetorical Impact Score: 1

Number: 5Device: A-13 Brevity, Verbosity and Moderationicon
Explanation

The details of his resignation are not mentioned.

Rhetorical Impact Score: 1

Number: 6Device: B-2 Metaphoricon
Explanation

This is a metaphorical use of سلسة.

Rhetorical Impact Score: 1

Number: 7Device: CH-1 Hyperboleicon
Explanation

Not all of them were huge scandals, some more like mistakes rather than something truly scandalous. So it is "journalistic licence" to call them "scandals."

Rhetorical Impact Score: 1

Number: 8Device: A-13 Brevity, Verbosity and Moderationicon
Explanation

It does not specify exactly how many weeks because this is not relevant, and would detract from the key facts i.e. Liz Truss had won.

Rhetorical Impact Score: 1

Number: 9Device: A-13 Brevity, Verbosity and Moderationicon
Explanation

This is appropriate verbosity, to explain who Rishi Sunak is.

Rhetorical Impact Score: 1

Total Rhetorical Impact Score: 9
#
Rhetorical device
Text Annotator's explanation of the rhetorical device
Number: 1Device: A-13 Brevity, Verbosity and Moderationicon
Explanation

The details of his resignation are not mentioned.

Rhetorical Impact Score: 1

Number: 2
Explanation

It does not specify exactly how many weeks because this is not relevant, and would detract from the key facts i.e. Liz Truss had won.

Rhetorical Impact Score: 1

Number: 3
Explanation

This is appropriate verbosity, to explain who Rishi Sunak is.

Rhetorical Impact Score: 1

Number: 4Device: B-2 Metaphoricon
Explanation

This is a metaphorical use of سلسة.

Rhetorical Impact Score: 1

Number: 5Device: CC-1 Repetitionicon
Explanation

This is a repetition of the title, which helps cement the understanding.

Rhetorical Impact Score: 1

Number: 6Device: CE-8 Forewarningicon
Explanation

This is a forewarning of what the content of the article is.

Rhetorical Impact Score: 1

Number: 7Device: CF-2 Finesse of Initiationicon
Explanation

This is a good starting for the article as it primes the reader for the content.

Rhetorical Impact Score: 1

Number: 8
Explanation

This also is a good way to start the piece.

Rhetorical Impact Score: 1

Number: 9Device: CH-1 Hyperboleicon
Explanation

Not all of them were huge scandals, some more like mistakes rather than something truly scandalous. So it is "journalistic licence" to call them "scandals."

Rhetorical Impact Score: 1

Total Rhetorical Impact Score: 9

Word tokens

Arabic words are often composed of smaller parts which are added onto the start or end of the word. When performing quantitative analysis of Arabic texts, it is necessary to split such compound words into their constituent parts, or word tokens. When the compound words in this text were split, this resulted in 98 word tokens. Each of these has been identified and counted as shown below.

فوز1 ليز2 ترأس3 ب+4 زعامة5 حزب6 المحافظين7 و+8 رئاسة9 الحكومة10 في11 بريطانيا12 تعهدت13 ترأس14 في15 خطاب16 +ها17 ب+18 إلحاق19 الهزيمة20 ب+21 حزب22 العمال23 في24 انتخابات25 عام26 272024 فازت28 وزيرة29 الخارجية30 البريطانية31 ليز32 ترأس33 ب+34 زعامة35 حزب36 المحافظين37 الحاكم38 ل+39 تصبح40 رئيسة41 ل+42 لحكومة43 خلفا44 ل+45 بوريس46 جونسون47 الذي48 أجبر49 على50 الاستقالة51 ب+52 سبب53 سلسلة54 من55 الفضائح56 و+57 خلال58 الأسابيع59 القليلة60 الماضية61 كانت62 استطلاعات63 الرأي64 ل+65 أعضاء66 حزب67 المحافظين68 ترجح69 فوز70 ترأس71 على72 منافس73 +ها74 وزير75 الخزانة76 السابق77 ريشي78 سوناك79 و+80 فازت81 ترأس82 ب83 8457 في85 المئة86 من87 أصوات88 أعضاء89 الحزب90 متفوقة91 على92 سوناك93 ب+94 نسبة95 9614 في97 المئة98

Quantitative rhetorical analysis

The text contains 6 different types of rhetorical devices, which have been used a total of 9 times. There are 98 word tokens in the text.

Rhetorical density

Rhetorical density is the number of rhetorical devices in the text (9) divided by the number of word tokens in the text (98), multiplied by 100.

The rhetorical density is therefore (9 ÷ 98) * 100 = 9.1837 rhetorical devices per 100 word tokens.

This text is exactly at the 15th percentile of all the texts in the Balagha Corpus for rhetorical density. This means it is more rhetorically dense than 15% of all the 5 texts in the Balagha Corpus.

Rhetorical Impact Score

A weighting factor has been applied by the annotator for each of the 9 times a rhetorical device has been used. The weighting factor may be 1 or 2, depending on the impact, effectiveness or complexity of the way the rhetorical device has been used. These weighting factors are shown in the tables above as "Rhetorical Impact Score" for each rhetorical device. The sum of the Rhetorical Impact Scores in this text is 9.

BALAGHA Score

The BALAGHA Score is the Rhetorical Impact Score divided by the number of word tokens in the text, multiplied by 100. By using the Rhetorical Impact Score rather than the number of rhetorical devices, the BALAGHA Score offers a more nuanced representation of rhetoricity than the rhetoric density alone.

This text's Rhetorical Impact Score is 9 and there are 98 word tokens. The BALAGHA Score is therefore (9 ÷ 98) * 100 = 9.1837 impact-weighted rhetorical devices per 100 word tokens.

This text is between the 35th and 50th percentile of all the 5 texts in the Balagha Corpus for BALAGHA Score. This means it has a higher BALAGHA Score than 35% of all the 5 texts in the Balagha Corpus. This text is therefore considered to have a level of rhetoricity which is "Below average".

Number of rhetorical devices
[+ Explain]

The number of times that rhetorical devices have been used in the text. For example, if a text contains 5 metaphors, 2 similes and 1 pun, the number of rhetorical devices is 5 + 2 + 1 = 8.

This text contains 9 rhetorical devices.

9
↳ using 6 unique rhetorical devices
Word tokens
[+ Explain]

The number of word tokens in the text.

Arabic words are often composed of smaller parts which are added onto the start or end of the word. When performing quantitative analysis of Arabic texts, it is necessary to split such compound words into their constituent parts, or word tokens.

Rhetorical density
[+ Explain]

Rhetorical density is the number of rhetorical devices in the text divided by the number of word tokens in the text, multiplied by 100.

For this text, there are 9 rhetorical devices and 98 word tokens.

The rhetorical density is therefore (9 ÷ 98) * 100 = 9.1837 rhetorical devices per 100 words or word tokens.

9.1837 rhetorical devices per 100 word tokens
Rhetorical Impact Score
[+ Explain]

The number of rhetorical devices in the text, but with a weighting for each one based on its impact, effectiveness or complexity.

BALAGHA score
[+ Explain]

The BALAGHA Score is the Rhetorical Impact Score divided by the number of word tokens in the text, multiplied by 100.

For this text, the Rhetorical Impact Score is 9 and there are 98 word tokens.

The BALAGHA Score is therefore (9 ÷ 98) * 100 = 9.1837 impact-weighted rhetorical devices per 100 word tokens.

9.1837 impact-weighted rhetorical devices per 100 word tokens

This chart illustrates the distribution of BALAGHA Scores in the Balagha Corpus, and the location of this text's BALAGHA Score in relation to the scores of other texts:

Join the discussion